There might be a risk of me sounding slightly obnoxious in this entry, so for all residents of Winnipeg - no offence! (at least not so very much ;)
The concept of what temperature is, seems to be getting a bit distorted in cold places like Winnipeg, since people tend to refer to wind chill number as the actual temperature. So, let us look at a few case studies:
- It's -20 outside, and no wind. You stand in the shadow, dressed in a parka, feeling comfortable. Why? Well, the heat of the body warms up a layer of air closest to your skin, and you're thus slightly insulated by this. Thus it actually feels warmer than it is and you don't feel the full -20.
- it's -20 outside, and a stern wind from the north is blowing. You complain, and pull the scarf tighter over your face, since you feel colder. Why? The wind is removing the layer of air closest to your skin, which makes the skin lose heat at a quicker rate, and thus you experience the cold stronger.
- You're submerged into a liquid that's chilled to -20 (obviously not water). Byebye.
All cases have a difference in pressure of the medium around you towards your skin. What changes is the rate in which you lose heat, not the actual temperature. You'll never get colder than -20 in any of these cases (which in all cases is pretty bad for the health, because -20 is pretty yuckily cold...)
- Common winnipeg misconception: It's -20 tonight but the wind chill is -40, I REALLY need to plug in my car! Well, yes, probably, because it's -20. It won't get chilled down to -40 though. It will however lose heat at a slightly quicker rate than if it wasn't windy, i.e. it might take 1 hour instead of 2 hours for the car to get cold after it was driven (never below -20 though!). Since you're probably staying in bed for longer than that during the night, it won't make a difference at all to you.
Thus, if it's -10, and a really nasty wind, your car will most likely start in the morning anyways, regardless of if it's plugged in or not (but you will still be complaining as you fight your way through the wind to the car, struggling with the keys to unlock it and rightly so, because it's MARCH and should be SPRING ugh...)
I had an interesting experience a few weeks ago, waiting for the train in Sydney. It was +41 outside. Sitting still, my body kept me chilled, but when the wind blew at me, it got really hot. the "wind heat" dried up my chilling sweat layer, and made me feel the real temperature (+41 is really hot...), but it didn't make it any hotter than +41, just as the wind chill doesn't make it colder. It's just your perception that changes due to the rate with which your body is being affected to the surrounding temperature.
(Then we have the extra wind chill you can add on someone who's spent 5 weeks in Australia, and comes back to Winnipeg - take off at least anouther 10 degrees! It took me about a week to get used to the cold again, and the time inbetween was terrrrible, I've never had so much pain walking to the bus in my life!!)
I can understand that it is important to know how quickly you will chill off in the wind, and I can agree that using an "equivalent temperature" gives a pretty good idea. What I don't like is how easy it is for people to misunderstand it, and think that it actually is colder than it is. The meteorological sites purposely don't use units on their wind chill estimates, to emphasize that it's not a real temperature.
Bring it on...
8 comments:
It's fine and dandy to nit-pick, Theresa, but what you really need to offer is a better solution. I'm proposing TTI (Time Till Icecube), that is, how long do I have to get to my car before I become an icecube. This would also make weather reports more dramatic, and give me more of a sense of urgency in the morning.
Although, wind chill is still somewhat useful to know when dealing with objects like cars that hit the minimum temperature. At -40 wind chill, it'll take longer to bring your car up to a good operating temperature, even with the head start of already being at -20.
I'd be a fan of TTI! Personally, I find that the wind speed information is all indication I need, although I'd prefer to get it in m/s directly. What I'd like is a measurement that doesn't distort the temperature concept, making people believe it's actually cooler than it is. Time, wind speed or something else would be fine. As for the warming up of the car, I can't imagine the time differences would be very large? seconds - 1minute? It'd be cool to see an investigation of that, Mr. Engineer!
And for my other interested readers, here's a link to back up my earlier statement
I'm sorry but when I walk from my car to the Church before 6 am and it's -20 and with the wind -38 it feels a lot colder than it does when there is no wind. Maybe I don't get it--but the bottom line is I'M JUST PLAIN COLD!!!!
This explains why you're always freezing and getting cut to pieces in Gothenburg - you're constantly emerged in liquid AND wind. It must be the coldest place in the world. (I agree this doesn't make it below zero though):)
exactly!! and even though you're freezing to pieces, with an insane windchill but a real temp of +2, you'll never get a frost bite, because it's... plus 2!
+2? What is this plus two you speak of? I don't believe a word of it.
I agree!
But then you have to remember that if the news didn't adjust their report to remind people that you will get colder when there is more wind, people would think "oh, it's only 10 below... so I suppose I don't need my scarf/mittens/toque/coat/boots". Never mind that they will get frostbite on unexposed skin in 15minutes. :)
I do like the idea of TTI though... we should really investigate that!
Wow Winnipeg is cold. Brrrr... i am all together sick of this weather and ready to make a move. Who's with me?
Post a Comment